16 October 2008

Sport lunch - competing with quick lunch



Expectation:
Not sure what to expect. Having tasted kvikk lunsj and kitekat earlier this one was the underdog.


First impression:
The wrapping is ok and as with many others a bit boring. Boring as it does not standout in anyway neither positive or negative.

Wrapping: 3


How does it look?
It looks quite good, but it crumbles more when you try to share it. I hate losing chocolate that way.

Appearance: 3



Is it yum-yum?
A surprise. It really made it hard to see what I prefer over its competitors. I think this one has a bit sweeter taste.

Taste: 4


Did I need one more?
I wouldn't mind one more, but if I had kitekat or kvikk lunsj it would lose out. Its not bad, but I just cannot see my buying this again when I have the other options.

Frequency: 2


Does it cost your shirt?
Not pricy at all. So you can safely go out and find it. But as for value for money it is all down to what you prefer. I would say kitekat (for kids) and kvikk lunsj (for grown ups) would be a safer choice.

Value for money: 3


Final statement:
It surprised me with a good taste, but it did not convince me that I should buy it again.

Total score: 15/30

No comments: